sam
@sam@cablespaghetti.dev
819 following, 775 followers
https://cablespaghetti.dev/hosting-a-fediverse-instance-on-an-original-raspberry-pi.html
Let the planning commence
Chalk lines covered over with ink and wiped away, leaving me with the lines to go over
Just curious, are the curves freehand?
@cazabon Yep. Everything but straight lines (for which I use an extremely paint-covered spirit level/ruler)
Whee.
It's just had the protective anti-UV coating put on it but once that's dry it's ready to go!
@babe ohhh i didn't know that coating existed, that's really neat
@FrazzledBrynn You can get it as a spray on varnish and a brush on varnish. I've never found one that I like for watercolours but there's a lot of good options for acrylic
@babe Ohh nice! I did wonder about watercolour, but I guess there's probably protective frames for those or something
@FrazzledBrynn There's a bunch of options available but the ones I've tried so far I've had either poor or mixed results with, even going very lightly with them :|
@babe Non-artist here. Is that to prevent sun damage?
And out of curiosity, does it change its characteristics under a blacklight?
@me Even with really good paints, sometimes pigments can fade with prolonged exposure to sunlight. Anti-UV varnished protect the pigment long term and prevent that breakdown.
I have no idea on the blacklight front, though if someone were to specifically request one without it I'd be happy to oblige with the understanding sunlight could be more likely to negatively impact it
It’ll be going on the wall of the office I spend most of my time in, after we move house soon.
@sam Oh wow, you scooped that one up quick! lol
There's something about them that just sings to me, it's hard to put my finger one what it is.
I've got it all packaged up and I should be able to get it sent out tomorrow for you 
Who’s to say at what point your brain will decide it’s has enough of doing these and the supply will dry up. 😝
Phone etiquette: Is talking on speakerphone in public rude or not?
Genuinely curious to see the results on this one. Please boost for exposure.
| Yes, very rude.: | 1489 |
| No, not rude at all.: | 47 |
Closed
@nuintari I'd default to yes, but more specific context would help. In a hospital waiting room? On a noisy, busy street?
@nuintari I think it's _only_ appropriate when there's another person next to you that is involved in the call. Being on the other end of speakerphone is also shite.
@nuintari this reads like a tumblr poll.
@nuintari on tumblr, you often have this weird hive mind effect where someone will post a poll, and it will skew in favour to one specific option.
@Gh0stlyM0use Okay, thanks for clarifying.
Though I do not believe being against people being loud and obnoxious in public is terribly unusual.
I dunno where you would ask this question and not get these kind of results.
@nuintari I agree on the loud. But then you see it happen often its like. Hrmm, did i miss the memo?
So I make mastadon hivemind tumblr joke. *looks doefully*
@nuintari if you use speaker phone in public then the public is free to join the conversation
@nuintari very rude to those around you, also very rude to the person youre talking to if you dont ask for their consent first
@himbovoorhees @nuintari
Do people actually put their friend on speaker without asking consent?
Yes to all of this. This is a loaded poll, BTW. I am sending the results to my mother, I could not be happier with them.
She answered a call in the doctor's office waiting room, and every single person waiting with us got the entire conversation clear as day whether they wanted it or not. I was her driver that day, and I was mortified.
Afterwards, I tried to explain it to her. She listened, for about a week. Her phone etiquette in general is just terrible, and I am done tolerating it.
@nuintari If you walk around on speaker phone holding it horizontally in front of your face, it takes all my energy to not slap that shit and smash it into the ground.
@nuintari Fark, I find talking on the phone at all quite rude. I actively seek out a private location for all calls.
@nuintari
No, not rude at all.
In fact, using the speaker phone is less rude to me than talking on the phone in public without speaker.
I see very little difference with talking to my friend in public when they're physically there.
I'm flabbergasted what makes so many of you think there's a difference?
@janneke @nuintari The volume makes a great difference. As long as you're next to each other, you can adjust to circumstances. If you have a switch to just screen louder than those circumstances, most people do.
And as far as I can tell: most people also talk louder themselves on the phone to make sure the other side can hear them better.
And therefore using your phone in public at all can imho still be rude, let alone on a speaker. Compare this to you and a friend talking in public spaces using a megaphone.
HTH
@jesterchen @nuintari
Yes, talking too loud with your friend in public, I consider that to be rude.
Whether that friend is physically present, or on the speaker phone.
That's not how I read the question, because, well, it's not part of the question. Your interpretation/extrapolation of this possibly probable essential missing bit of information is certainly helpful. So, thanks!
I would appreciate it though, if people would include essential information when asking questions, and I would also appreciate it if people would answer a question as it is being asked, instead of adding random information and then answering that modified question.
@jesterchen @nuintari
As an aside, people apparently being unwilling, or possibly unable to formulate a question as they mean for it to be answered, was one ingredient that made the curriculum-and-test-based school system so terrible for me.
You should have answered the question that I actually meant to ask, not the question that I factually asked. All the other students did that, so you're wrong.
Or: You're the only one who believes the question to be ambiguous. Also, you're cunningly giving me two answers ("This question can be interpreted in two ways, I'll answer both variants: if you're asking A, then B, if you're asking C, then D") and I'm not falling for your clever way to be always right.
@janneke @jesterchen @actuallyautistic
I didn't "want" this question answered one way or another. I legitimately wanted to know if it was just me that thinks it is insanely rude. I worded it as such. Turns out, I'm with the majority for once in my life.
The reason it is rude is because of the effect speakerphone have on conversation volumes: It drives them up. If you were just speaking to a friend close by, you would naturally(hopefully) adjust to each other's volume levels and the ambient noise level and in all likelihood(again, hopefully), keep it down. When you use speakerphone, it comes through loud and clear for everyone in the vicinity, this also has the impact of making the local phone operator tend to elevate their own voice.
So, while using the earpiece would result in everyone nearby hearing little more than your likely hushed voice. Using speakerphone in the same situation usually means we can all hear every word of both sides of your conversation loud and clear. Speakerphone causes you to be loud in public. This is why it is rude.
@nuintari @jesterchen @actuallyautistic
> I didn't "want" this question answered one way or another.
Is that so? I now believe you were specifically looking for speakerphone conversations that are way too loud. And I also believe that's what around 97% of respondents people assumed and actually answered to.
> The reason it is rude is because of the effect speakerphone have on conversation volumes: It drives them up.
Those are two separate things: talking loud vs speakerphone. I hypothesize that people don't think it's hardly about the speakerphone at all, it's mostly about the volume.
I also hypothesize that a hushed conversation on speakerphone is much less rude, if it is rude at all, than a much too loud conversation between live persons.
The apparent fact that many of you observed that most people are unskilled using their speakerphone and talk too loud, has nothing to do with the speakerphone.
@janneke @jesterchen @actuallyautistic You are being needlessly pedantic. Which I guess is just you being you.
@nuintari @jesterchen @actuallyautistic
That's what people have been telling me all my life, although usually not in such a friendly way as you do it.
"Don't answer the question that I ask, answer the question that you guess that I probably meant to ask."
@nuintari Although talking into your phone in public, while not in speakerphone mode, would be about as rude.
@sibrosan People tend to be significantly quieter when using the earpiece. Though I do agree that phone use in public is tacky and rude.
Save it for later, it can in all likelihood wait.
@nuintari And in any case: You have a phone. You do not have to tell so the other person can hear you.
@nuintari It seems like a thing wine moms do.
@DeltaWye My mother isn't a wino, but she does it EVERYWHERE.
Doctor's office, grocery store, pharmacy, out for walks with the dog, you name it.
She is the secretary of her church, and she walks down the hall.... chatting away for everyone to hear.
@wendinoakland @DeltaWye No, her hearing is fine.
Im the one with a hearing problem. AFAIC, it is no excuse. Take the call elsewhere if you need speakerphone that much.
Also, speakerphone doesn't help me. Held close and loud is what my one working ear needs.
@nuintari I think it depends on the content of the call and where you're calling from. Just outside in an open space and chit chatting, nah, not rude. But in a confined indoor space or on public transport and sensitive content, yeah, probably best to leave that call for when you're home.
@rlegowski1 I don't want to hear your idle chitchat anymore than I want to hear the results of your latest urine analysis.
@nuintari Not rude at all. There's zero difference between talking to a friend on the speaker or IRL.
@UrbanDjent The difference is that using the speakerphone typically forces the local operator to speak with significantly more volume than if they could be bothered to bring the phone up to their ear. So now everyone around you can hear both sides of the conversation, loud and clear.
So no, you are wrong, it is fucking rude because you are being extra loud and obnoxious in a public space. I'm pretty sure the 96% of respondents who agree with me will tell you the same thing.
@nuintari Clearly you didn't need a poll. You could have just stated your opinion, as I have stated mine.
@UrbanDjent No, I really wanted to know what other people thought, I wanted to know if I was alone in thinking it was so insanely rude. Clearly, I am not alone.
I did hope I would get results like these, because the reason I made the poll was to send the results, if favorable, to my own mother. Her phone etiquette is beyond terrible.
@nuintari @UrbanDjent You don't want people's honest opinions, or you would have included options other than those two extremes.
@nuintari @tychotithonus
IMO: Very dependent on circumstances, esp how loud the speakerphone is, how close other people are, and acoustics in general. So, less “is it speakerphone” and more “are you being a disruptive annoyance?”
Full disclosure, I was expecting about a 75% on the side of rudeness. I made this poll because if the results were anything like what I expected, I could send the results to my mother, whose phone etiquette is beyond vile.
96% and counting means she might actually listen to me about this this time.
@nuintari it’s not just rude, it’s really dumb. Do people not understand that everyone around them can hear and are listening to the ENTIRE conversation? Have they told the party on the other side that they are in a public place? It always amazes me when people actually do this for business calls when a competitor might be sitting or standing in earshot. 🙄
I strongly suspect the overlap between people voting no on this poll and the people who walk around in public blasting music from their Beats speakers is almost a perfect circle.
@nuintari I voted no because I don’t think it’s speakerphone that makes it inherently rude, it’s conducting conversations of a type and place that doesn’t fit. Walking down a sidewalk on your way to the grocery store? Sure, whatever. Actually in the store, talking about getting a boil on your ass lanced? Yeah, no.
@ajn142 One of the, "Well..... technically....." answers. 🙂
Not how most people interpreted it, but fair. Most people defending their no vote are basically defending their right to be a dick in public.
@nuintari TBF, I used to do it more, I have trouble focusing on and processing a phone call when it’s in one ear only. Since I’ve gotten earbuds (wireless in particular, with a transparency/hear-through mode), I find those to be equally usable and a lot less problematic.
@nuintari speakerphone is allowed if the person can not hold the phone at their ear and can’t leave. For example, a plumber works the pipes. Their hands are busy and they can’t leave the pipes.
In all other cases I assume my inclusion is deliberate. Most of the time unnecessary but apparently my input is still required to the point I need to hear both participants.
@pointlessone You mean for things it was actually designed for? Sure, very useful.
One might argue that talking on the phone in public where people can only hear one side of the conversation is more rude than allowing them to hear both sides.
@the5thColumnist Counterargument, as I have said elsewhere in this thread: Speakerphone tends to make people talk significantly louder. A one sided conversation is far more likely to be hushed.
<or>
I don't want to here half the conversation, let alone all of it,
@nuintari does this include video calls as well, like FaceTime or Teams? I ask because most people tend to not have headphones when they interact with these types of calls.
IMHO it’s lack of awareness, or disregard for other people’s peace. If you are in a public park with no one else around….sure, take aunt Susan’s speakerphone call, but if you are on a bus or at the grocery store…it’s just bad manners. Maybe that is the takeaway. You can do whatever you want until it begins to have adverse effects on other people, then it’s time to reconsider behaviors.
@nuintari it also breaches the privacy of the person on the other end of the line - if I'm phoning someone, I'd rather not have a bus load of random strangers forced to listen in, ta
@nuintari When I have no headphones I would set it on speakers because my hearings are pretty bad.
Doesn't help that folk are goddamn loud in public
@nuintari the speakerphone part is not relevant. I don't want to hear half your private conversation either.
@brooke True, but I would rather hear half your conversation in controlled tones than the two sided shoutfest a speakerphone in public always turns into.
@nuintari Yes, very rude. OTOH I regard someone using a speakerphone as an invitation to random passers by to join in.
@nuintari
I don’t even like talking on phone in public, period. Unless it’s a very short and efficient conversation.
@nuintari Rather more clear than most poll results here. :)
@nuintari In Asia, I bet the results of this poll would be almost exactly inversed. The normal situation is people yelling into their phones on speakerphone – and it’s one of the worst parts of Asia, tbh.
@nuintari just a theory... but...
On television shows these days, they get everyone to talk on speaker phone because that way the audience can hear both sides of the conversation, especially reality and documentaries.
This might be accidentally normalizing that behaviour.
@stevefenton We call that a hypothesis, not a theory.
@nuintari but this is built on the extensive evidence of me thinking about it for 20 to 30 seconds
@stevefenton Oh well then, pardon me. This Theory of Televized Normalization of Rudeness is quite well tested then.
@nuintari I agree with the results, but I’d like to understand why it is different from two people talking in public. There must be something about the volume, the sound quality or the way a phone conversation is perceived in this rudeness production.
@tagomago This is a really interesting point and it did make me wonder. I think it might be because speakerphone tends to make people raise their voices in a way they might not if face to face? Or possibly something to do with the additional sibilance and harshness added by the tinny little phone speaker and audio compression?
@tagomago That is exactly it, read the many, many responses, and you will find people, myself included, stating it over and over again. It is all about the volume level.
Two people talking in public will usually hush themselves down to the minimum required volume. Outside observers might catch a word here or there, but will only get the entire conversation if they focus their attention on it. When people use speakerphone in public, that goes out the window, and the conversation becomes loud and clear to everyone nearby.
Some people defending the use of speakerphone in public claim that those people are just being rude and it isn't the technology itself is the problem. While technically correct, the technology as designed and built encourages people to yell into the phone, and turn their speaker volume way up.
@nuintari I would say yes, but for work I use speakerphone as I need to see the screen info, I have a radio earpiece going off & the station is busy & loud.
@Nikkileah I wouldnt call work a public place.
@nuintari it is when it's a railway station 😊
@nuintari
It depends, but mostly it's rude
There are however times where it's acceptable as long as you keep volume normal, because you're not bothering people at those moments. Those moments relate to environment, time, and general consensus of people around.
Example: it cóúld be ok walking on farmroads outside of wild animal breeding areas (which are marked here, and require silence). Or in a server room to get over the noise. But even those have details that might change it's acceptability.
@Cambion I said public, I would hardly call a server room a public space.
If no one is around, sure, it's fine. if you have a legitimate need to remain hands free, also fine. But most situations where you have a legitimate reason to remain hands free constitute a work situation.
As for keeping the volume down, my beef is that virtually no one does. You should hear my mother belt into her phone anywhere and everywhere.
@nuintari I mean, technically stores also aren't public spaces (at least legally, in The Netherlands) so I took it a bit broader as places with possible other people. Server rooms depend, for me it's a room in a giant data centre, that contains more people from more companies.
For me, I live in a village. Here it can be fine despite other people around if sound is not too loud. Similarly as people having some music on when doing the garden or cleaning windows. Here, not loudly is normal.
@Cambion As an American, I can honestly say, Americans are obnoxiously fucking loud.
Server rooms are always a workplace, there is no expectation otherwise. Stores may not technically be public places, but they are filled with people mostly hoping to go about their business in peace.
Everyone responding is talking this as such a black and white issue. Of course there is nuance to the issue. But generally speaking, the way people use it in public is pretty disrespectful of those around them.
@nuintari Oh I do agree to your last paragraph. Hence me starting with "but mostly it's rude" 😉.
But what can I say, I love nuances. In general, most people tend to take things too black and white when reality rarely is. I'd say it's refreshing to see more comments pointing nuances out.
@Cambion yes, but I thought the, "Yes, there are always exceptions" was implied.
I often forget some people are completely incapable of reading between the lines. Because yeah, black and white issues almost never actually exist. I have to remind myself that some people will interpret you as acting as if they do unless you outright spell it out.
@warandpeas In the future, we're going to refer to this stuff as "organic content" and you're going to pay a lot more for it.
@warandpeas "Cmon! 600 Token. All genuine. All good stuff. Look at this! All handwritten on paper, with a pencil! Man! A fricking Pencil!"
@warandpeas
YouTube has figured out that I'm not interested in all that AI crap and now only recommends videos that are more than four years old.
I love this AI! ❤️
EDIT: Translated using Deepl AI.
@warandpeas Based. This makes me think of a song that I love dearly: "Those left standing will make millions,
Writing books on the way it should have been"
"Warning" by Incubus on their album "Morning View"
also:
"Floating in this cosmic Jacuzzi,
We are like frogs oblivious,
to the water,
starting to boil,
No one flinches, we all float face down"
Thank you for the wonderful art!
@warandpeas Yeah, but the trouble with street books is the dealers are cutting that shit with AI slop.
@warandpeas It's already happening. A lot of people are advertising their stuff as "made by a real human" or "no AI".
@warandpeas I'd totally love to see a sequel of Fahrenheit 451 where real books are outlawed now in favor of AI generated ones.
New by me - Microsoft Vibing. A very strange fake open source project published by Microsoft employees, which gathers screenshots and voice recordings of users with unique machine identifiers attached. Not sure how this one has happened.
This Vibing one is a fun blog btw as every page it gets to be a bigger version of this
Since publishing my blog, Yaoyao Chang, who authored Vibing, has removed references to it from Microsoft’s VibeVoice repo - marking the change as “removing outdated links”. https://github.com/microsoft/VibeVoice/commit/e73d1e17c3754f046352014856a922f8208fb5d3
@GossiTheDog this is all very surreal 🫠
On the other hand, Microsoft could be preparing a new season of their Standards of Business Conduct training "Trust Code" in the wild 😂
I withheld a load of details from the blog on this so far btw, if you're a researcher and want a laugh pull the binaries and have a look at what the MS Research team were doing and poke the backend.
Something tells me Microsoft are going to end up freezing the Azure backend for Vibing and having a security incident.
Vibing has been suspended and downloads removed pending a compliance review by Microsoft. https://github.com/VibingJustSpeakIt/Vibing
Also worth noting - Yaoyao Chang made the changes to the Vibing-Team repo, which is the first time Microsoft has officially been linked to Vibing.
It’s a very strange situation where MS were covertly operating an AI service, while pretending it was an open source project.
@GossiTheDog I feel like I'm being led into a Cyberpunk questline; with the unplanned discovery of a Redmond deniable op harvesting data out of a front operation.
Vibing has been made unavailable for download from Microsoft Store:
Microsoft are now trying to hide the compliance review message, by removing the download links and removing the compliance review messages on Github. https://github.com/VibingJustSpeakIt/Vibing/commit/ab8e6302543754685f85cf02e02d1d0287d2f4f0
Did anybody happen to the screenshot or archive the Microsoft Vibing website ( https://vibingjustspeakit.github.io/Vibing/ ) and Github ( https://github.com/VibingJustSpeakIt/Vibing/ ) showing the compliance suspension messages before they were deleted? The changes are archived on GitHub, but I'd like to document what they looked like prior to removal.
@GossiTheDog https://infosec.exchange/@simonpoirier/116459614756235115
It is just the suspension message
An attempt to hide the MS link with Microsoft Vibing on GitHub - “This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.” - the commit hiding the compliance review has been redone today without Yaoyao’s name on it.
New commit: https://github.com/VibingJustSpeakIt/Vibing/commit/84c82ccad2092b4bc2dffe5c96ef8c8d4466cc6e
Hidden commit: https://github.com/VibingJustSpeakIt/Vibing/commit/ab8e6302543754685f85cf02e02d1d0287d2f4f0
So @dangoodin asked Microsoft about Vibing - they’ve confirmed it is a Microsoft research project. They say “We have removed the application as we review its functionality and adherence to our policies. We remain committed to responsible AI and are taking appropriate steps as part of this review.”
Here's a question - re the Microsoft Vibing thing.
Microsoft didn't disclose they were behind Vibing, multiple staff pretended on Github it was an open source community project (it wasn't), one specifically said they weren't involved (they were), they collected screenshots and mic recordings, and it had no security, compliance or AI review by Microsoft.
Is that okay?
@GossiTheDog I think it is less malice and more disorganization.
@Sempf I'm not saying malice, for what it's worth. But is it okay for an org to do that, and then just.. nobody cares? Not a single press outlet covered it, for example. It's just like, yolo, orgs can do whatever they want as it's vibing.
@GossiTheDog No, it really isn't. The market has become more accepting of behavior like that, so there is less rigor in those orgs to prevent said behavior. If the community makes more of a stink there is a chance it will curb itself. But I don't think they were "out to put one over on us" as someone said in a recent article.
Totally. That’s insane. Y’know, I’ve seen some stuff, but reading your blog, this is bad. Probably just a screw up, but they seriously need to get a handle on this and be pressured to do so openly and transparently.
Weird that this hasn’t been much more widely covered. I can see a few sites have repackaged your blog, but I’d expect at least The Reg to cover this. Ideally more.
@GossiTheDog It’s just Vibislop doing typical Viboslop things. Of course it’s not okay, and the company gets wristslapped ever so gently evey now and then for its transgressions. And then carries on doing what it does.
@GossiTheDog
TBH, when I first read your writeup, I didn't believe that it was from Microsoft, the company.
@wdormann it is. I've found more I haven't posted, they've basically been having people pretend to be open source projects to bypass their own governance. But literally nobody gives a shit outside of MS.
I think at this point everyone is numb to the big companies being absolute shitbags when it comes to anything AI related
@GossiTheDog @wdormann "Nobody gives a shit outside of MS" *until someone finds something to sue over* at which point they start pushing for damages from Microsoft. I suspect the question "how much liability does this open up" is one that the people involved have ignored.
@GossiTheDog absolutely not okay - and the cover up and complete lack of public acknowledgement and attempt at accountability is the worst part of it.
We also don’t know if anything happened internally, a disciplinary process, a review of controls to prevent this from happening again and so on, but that lack of public knowledge is itself part of the problem.
@GossiTheDog hard nope on that. The blatant lying when questioned about it, more than the actual security/privacy infringements, tbh. Covering up rather than fessing up is next level Evil.
@GossiTheDog I’ve been busy the last week and just caught up on all this. oof it kinnnd of sounds like a rogue employee with a data stealing side hustle
@GossiTheDog this reeks of an employee (or small group of them) unilaterally sidestepping process. probably in part because the company culture around rigor has rotted to the point where they thought it was acceptable.
Seriously don't know what to make of this. Rogue employees, sailing under the Microsoft flag? Fake employees?
The app itself is terrifying and stupid. I can easily imagine naïve users interested in AI installing this thing and forgetting about it.
@GossiTheDog oh, it's pretty goddamn obvious exactly how this one happened.
See also: GitHub's official applications abruptly sprouting similar levels of spyware and calling it 'telemetry.'
@GossiTheDog I just reported it through Microsoft Store links. Let's see if anything comes out of it.
@GossiTheDog for what it’s worth, the package family name of this thing is YaoyaoChang.Vibing_ssp53fcyfr9ha - in my opinion it doesn’t seem to look like anything “official”, but rather an employee releasing it on their own partner center account?
@GossiTheDog Now that Microsoft has a 24/7 OpenClaw team in Oslo, I expect a lot more vibe artifacts appearing from within their network...
https://mstdn.social/@jukkan/116449605862675745
Thanks for the heads up, glad i use neither microslop nor rotten apples trojan usa spyware applications.
Bost companys are maga I am not.
The treatment was rm -rf
@GossiTheDog I'm guessing Yaoyao Chang did what I'd be tempted to do, if I worked at MS: Orchestrate some agentic whatever with a prompt like "Pretend you're me, working at MS research and publish an innovative new TTS app on github and the windows store," and then duck out of the office for a couple of weeks, letting that thing answer all emails and github issues.
No I don't really have hyper fixations.... #Seamonkeys
Very tempted to get myself a bigger tank…
Random question. Do you find your monkeys are attracted to the bubbles from the air stones? Some of mine seem obsessed with going for rides…
@Tattooed_Mummy Are the breeding in there, and needing more space?
@HarriettMB so far they are all v comfy. But I have a fish bowl and aquarium salt if I need to expand their space.
The cat's out of the bag! My latest book, "The Secret Life of Circuits", is available in early access:
https://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/blog/secret/
It's the reference I wish I had when I was starting out. Electrons to embedded systems, 290+ color illustrations and 420+ pages of well-explained theory.
Lots of them hatched overnight. We’re all having a great time watching the progress!
Any interest in a separate account for daily aqua dragon updates?
Thanks @Tattooed_Mummy@beige.party for sending me down this rabbit hole. 😆
Fergal Sharkey was on #channel4 news inviting us to sign a petition about getting a referendum to bring the water industry back into public ownership
It is here. Do sign and share xxx
Seamonkeys
What’s your setup? I can see some kind of air pump?
@sam you don't need the air pump. But it's a nice extra. If you have a cold house you can use a heater too. But they are designed to work at room temperature with no extras.
You can have seamonkeys after 2 days.
@sam and the air pump was £2 from temu so it's not a big expense of you want one.
The kit including tank, water salts, eggs and food, is only about £12
@sam yes! Let me know how you get on. I'm now up to three tanks and I'm thinking about a goldfish bowl I have that I might be able to change to a Seamonkey enclosure. I live near the beach and someone I know said you can put seaweed in the tanks for them to eat and play in as well so I'm tempted to try that
@Tattooed_Mummy
Now I no longer need to buy Seamonkeys from the back of a comic book.
I can just watch your video, Tattooed Nonna.
Thank YOU.
PS: I always hated to wait the days -- or weeks -- it took for things to arrive in the mail after I ordered them.
🚨 Trivy is under attack again.
Attackers force-pushed 75 of 76 tags in aquasecurity/trivy-action, impacting 10K+ workflows and turning trusted GitHub Actions into malware.
Any version ≠ v0.35.0 may execute an infostealer in CI.
Analysis forthcoming: https://socket.dev/blog/trivy-under-attack-again-github-actions-compromise
Been working on a small decentralised music search tool https://squirrel.band/, initially indexing sites using faircamp (by @freebliss).
Currently grabs the sites listed on https://simonrepp.com/faircamp/ and in the webring (https://faircamp.webr.ing/) using each pages available RSS feeds, keen to add more sources if anyone has any suggestions.
An appropriate T-shirt for today.
@neil where can I get one I absolutely need it
@wombatpandaa @neil you steal the design from Neil :-)
And make sure to use the rip off (“stolen”) version of the font like they did on the original campaign….
Ageless Linux: Software for humans of indeterminate age. We don't know how old you are. We don't want to know. We are legally required to ask. We won't.
@nixCraft This website is such an excellent rebuttal to the nonsensical parameters of the Californian law. Funny read!
@nixCraft love this, but the website is very US-centric. This age verification madness is sweeping the whole world.
@nixCraft Here's the #Debian #SystemDCensorD proposal, using D-Bus - "On installation, the user will be required to enter their location. ... This location and user data will be managed by a new daemon, systemd-censord, ... For example, ... a unit for China will implement keyword scans ... debian will need to switch to being a binary-only distribution ... with ... controls to prevent any non-signed software from being installed , written, or compiled, ..."
[1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2026/03/msg00018.html
@nixCraft is this a joke? or i don't get it. when it requires first the download or e.g. debian, but debian itself requires the age check on install, how can ageless linux work, when you have to run the conversion script after the debian installation?
@nixCraft I love this solution, but what are the plans for hardware providers? I feel like companies that offer Linux pre-installed will be the ones on the hook for ensuring the age verification is there. Will there be California editions that come with no OS?
@nixCraft linux can’t fundamentally do age verification because how it’s built into the system to be local by default and even if something was made you could literally strip it out of the source code so even if a company like Ubuntu added it into something a dev team like Linux Mint would remove that crap anyway.
The law makers really are showing their age being out of touch with technology like my mother and grandmother.
@nixCraft One can assemble your own linux-based operating system from scratch... how's blocking that gonna work?
I would like to drop armhf (armv6) support in #AlpineLinux. The only current hardware I am aware of that is armv6 is Raspberry Pi Zero series (EOL 2030). I don't think it is worth the extra effort to support both armhf (armv6) and armv7 at this point.
Do you think we should drop armhf to free up some resources?
| Lets drop both armhf and armv7 (no 32 bit arm): | 54 |
| Lets drop armhf (armv6) but lets keep armv7: | 67 |
| NOOOOO! Lets keep both armhf and armv7!!!!!: | 52 |
Closed
@ncopa In the embedded/industrial space I'm still seeing a surprising amount of ARM9 and expect those to go on quite a while, but that'd be v5, so even older. v7 seems like a more sensible target for Alpine 32bit support than trying to keep that /and/ v6 on life support together.
@ncopa I have AlpineLinux on an RPi 1 running pi-hole (head-less). More efficient and such a nice experience compared to RaspberryOS.
@mjwin yeah, I guess what I have been thinking so far is that if you still use RPi 1, which OS would make sense to run?
Even if we'd drop armhf now, you could still continue to use alpine 3.23 for a while.
@ncopa i wonder how apk would react if an edge system were to upgrade an upstream had no packages for it. i say that because i upgraded my pi0w 1.1 to edge because i was trying to get mdns to work and i read that avahi2dns and unbound worked.
@ncopa Removing armv7 would have major impact on postmarketOS as we still have many people actively working on devices with such CPUs. On the contrary armhf is pretty much dead.
armhf (and armv7) are very heavily used in education: many schools/universities are using lots of devices in labs to teach computing/coding, as they are so cheap and powerful-enough for this.
That's many users: 1 teacher admin => lots of silent students, and probably new users down-the-road...
#AlpineLinux is ideal distro to learn (small, simple, secure), and one of the last one to support those arch (is a feature, not a reason to give-up).
(poll seems closed now...guess my vote 😉 )
The UK Government has launched a public consultation which is seeking views on whether to ban children from using social media. This consultation will run until 26 May 2026.
It is highly likely that later this year, the establishment will attempt to introduce legislation which forces social media platforms (potentially including Mastodon) and VPNs to verify the age of their users. Therefore, this consultation is likely to be the only opportunity we will have to push back against these authoritarian measures.
Please take the time to read the consultation and answer the questions (especially if you are the parent or carer of a young person):
https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/growing-up-in-the-online-world-a-national-consultation
@Mandrake "children aged 21 or younger"
I thought we called them "adults" once they got to 18.
@revk Always vindicating to see the Government's mask slip and reveal their determination to infantilise young adults
You can only pick one
| Custard creams: | 146 |
| Bourbons: | 118 |
Closed
And since we're doing some brit posting
| Daddy: | 18 |
| Chips: | 128 |
Closed
@babe daddy? 
@sidd_harth0_5h4h or chips
@babe who are these heretics voting custard creams?
Are they all non Brits who think this is some kind of cold set dessert vs whiskey battle?
@mgleadow If I could vote I would go for the custard creams ngl, although I am partial to a bourbon, especially with a good brew
@babe they are all acceptable biscuit, but are not as tolerant as bourbons are to overconsumption - the taste becomes a bit sickly and cloying
My favourite biscuit of the moment is plain chocolate digestive, and for tea dunking it's a three way fight between gingernuts, and the basic staples of rich tea and unmolested digestive
@babe Normally Bourbon 100% of the time, but the new Marks and Spencer chocolate coated custard creams are something it's worth treating yourself with!
@babe Bourbons are good, but only one of these choices is worthy of the elegant carving of artisan biscuitmasons.
Highlight of the #GortonAndDenton #byelection: The #DailyTelegraph sent their man out to talk to Green Party #GPEW canvassers.
It did not go well for him. 😅🤣
Linux 7.0 launches with enablement for Intel Nova Lake, AMD Zen 6 — major kernel update expected in Ubuntu 26.04 LTS and Fedora 44 first
A major kernel update, Linux 7.0, has been officially released. Although it'll take some time to show up in various Linux distros, the kernel comes with preliminary support for AMD's upcoming Zen 6 and Intel's Nova Lake.
#hardware
https://www.tomshardware.com/software/linux/linux-7-0-launches-with-enablement-for-intel-nova-lake-amd-zen-6-major-kernel-update-expected-in-ubuntu-26-04-lts-and-fedora-44-first
Unfortunately plug-in/balcony solar isn’t legal in the UK at this point. There has been talk of legalising it but I don’t think any of it has made it into law.
The UK has announced plans to fast-track legislation requiring “age verification for VPN use”. The correct term, however, is not age verification but identity verification.
A law like this would require everyone to identify themselves in order to use a VPN. This would pose a risk to whistleblowers, violate human rights, and represent yet another step toward an authoritarian society.
The first loop 2 finishers: Sébastien Raichon in 22:35:40; Mathieu Blanchard :42; Damian Hall :44. At the same time, another loop 2 runner has quit and is tapped out. #BM100
Ohhh Iain and Damian are running and the rumor mill is talking about a certain Kilian might be running #BM100 #UltraRunning #BarkleyMarathon
Ohhh and it sounds like Jasmin (not on list) is there too and Emma from Ireland (on list) and some French dudes ;)
The 2026 Barkley Marathons began with one of the strongest fields ever. The starting field came from 15 Counties as well as 15 States, and included ten women. The course seemed not to care. Over 70% of the field is done. #BM100
Water Ballon Guy has begun loop 2, followed quickly by another French guy. Seven runners are on loop 2. #BM100
Moltbook was peak AI theater, less of a glimpse at the future and more of a mirror simply reflecting society's current obsession with AI (Will Douglas Heaven/MIT Technology Review)
https://www.technologyreview.com/2026/02/06/1132448/moltbook-was-peak-ai-theater/
http://www.techmeme.com/260208/p18#a260208p18