cablespaghetti.dev is a Fediverse instance that uses the ActivityPub protocol. In other words, users at this host can communicate with people that use software like Mastodon, Pleroma, Friendica, etc. all around the world.

This server runs the snac software and there is no automatic sign-up process.

Site description
Cablespaghetti's personal snac instance
Admin email
sam@cablespaghetti.dev
Admin account
@sam@cablespaghetti.dev

Search results for tag #jobs

[?]Open Rights Group » 🌐
@openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org

New opportunity to work with ORG 🚀

We're looking for an independent consultant or small consultancy to produce a report for organisations to reduce their dependence on large technology infrastructure providers and towards a collaborative open source model.

Closing date: 30 September.

Apply now ⬇️

openrightsgroup.org/consultant

    [?]Adrianna Tan » 🌐
    @skinnylatte@hachyderm.io

    [?]Adrianna Tan » 🌐
    @skinnylatte@hachyderm.io

    Adrianna Tan boosted

    [?]Adrianna Tan » 🌐
    @skinnylatte@hachyderm.io

    WTL boosted

    [?]Vanni Di Ponzano ⁂🚴 ❤️ ☕ 🍎 » 🌐
    @bici@mastodon.social

    [?]Adrianna Tan » 🌐
    @skinnylatte@hachyderm.io

    [?]Adrianna Tan » 🌐
    @skinnylatte@hachyderm.io

    UCSB is hiring a postdoctoral researcher in whale ecology and biology

    Looks like a whale of a time

    recruit.ap.ucsb.edu/JPF03150

      [?]Paco Hope [He/Him] » 🌐
      @paco@infosec.exchange

      I know working at Amazon is not very popular here. But this software development engineer role is recently opened on my team.

      it doesn't report to me, but for better or for worse, it would work closely with me.

      It's Amazon so: on-site, in the office is a non-negotiable requirement. 2 offices are assigned: Seattle, WA and Herndon, VA. Also non-negotiable. It reads heavy on AI. Everything has to be AI-washed now.

      My leaders and recruiters are completely mystified why we struggle to hire people in this job market.

      What am I doing down here in this deep hole? And what's my best shovel doing down here with me?

      amazon.jobs/en/jobs/10477936/s

        [?]Adrianna Tan » 🌐
        @skinnylatte@hachyderm.io

        The San Francisco public library is seeking to hire a CIO for a 3 year term.

        If you’re interested, my DMs are open. I previously worked for this city and hired for it and am familiar with all of the hiring requirements listed on the page.

        careers.sf.gov/role?id=3743990

          [?]Steffen Voß » 🌐
          @kaffeeringe@social.tchncs.de

          :
          Die sucht Leute:
          👉 Teilprojektleitung Verkehrsanlagenplanung (m/w/d)
          👉 Projektmanager*in (m/w/d)
          👉 Projektcontroller*in (m/w/d)
          👉 Management-Referent*in (m/w/d)

          Jetzt bewerben: stadtbahn-kiel.de/

            Raff Karva boosted

            [?]kat donegan (she/her) 🇵🇸✊ » 🌐
            @kathimmel@mstdn.social

            came across another cool vacancy for which i'm not remotely qualified, but someone reading this might be.
            culture for climate scotland is looking for a project officer to support the 'sea change' initiative in buckie.

            cultureforclimate.scot/job/sea

              Mike Cox boosted

              [?]Stephen 🌈 (he/him) [he/him/his] » 🌐
              @firepoet@tech.lgbt

              Periodic check in.. anybody hiring programmers for that don’t require them to use LLMs?

                [?]Wen » 🌐
                @Wen@mastodon.scot

                If it can be done properly this seems like a very good idea. Of course the usual suspects are screaming ‘anti growth’, 'trade unions bad’ as loud as they can. Of course the divil will be in the details and downgrading environmental (after all we all have to live with the consequences) considerations will be disastrous. But the whining from Badenoch et all is getting even more tedious.

                From the article,

A photograph of Burnham with the text

Labour will prioritise companies for government contracts if they give trade unions access to their employees, offer higher pay than the minimum wage and provide flexible working.

Andy Burnham has announced that the government will double the credit given to companies bidding for central government contracts that provide “social value” for local communities.

They will be required to show how they are supporting people into work and addressing local skills shortages as part of the prime minister’s pledge to deliver “growth in every postcode”. It represents a new focus on creating jobs rather than meeting green targets. Previously social value was measured partly by meeting environmental goals.


Details of the plans, which have been published by the Cabinet Office, show that employers will be rewarded for “fair working conditions” and “fair pay”.

The Conservatives claimed that Labour was “rolling out a trade union checklist of anti-growth policies” and said that it would burden businesses with more red tape.

Under the changes, the weighting for the “social value” that companies deliver will be doubled from 10 per cent to 20 per cent for contracts worth more than £5million. It represents a significant overhaul of the £90 billion public procurement system.

The Cabinet Office has proposed companies that demonstrate “fair working conditions” and offer staff “more than the statutory minimum” should be awarded more points. It said that this could include “access to trade union representation” and “flexible working arrangements”, along with promoting “a positive workplace culture”.

It also said that employers should offer “fair pay”, with more points awarded for companies that “go further” than the minimum wage of £12.71 an hour, offer “progressive” pay policies and “reward and retain staff”.

                Alt...From the article, A photograph of Burnham with the text Labour will prioritise companies for government contracts if they give trade unions access to their employees, offer higher pay than the minimum wage and provide flexible working. Andy Burnham has announced that the government will double the credit given to companies bidding for central government contracts that provide “social value” for local communities. They will be required to show how they are supporting people into work and addressing local skills shortages as part of the prime minister’s pledge to deliver “growth in every postcode”. It represents a new focus on creating jobs rather than meeting green targets. Previously social value was measured partly by meeting environmental goals. Details of the plans, which have been published by the Cabinet Office, show that employers will be rewarded for “fair working conditions” and “fair pay”. The Conservatives claimed that Labour was “rolling out a trade union checklist of anti-growth policies” and said that it would burden businesses with more red tape. Under the changes, the weighting for the “social value” that companies deliver will be doubled from 10 per cent to 20 per cent for contracts worth more than £5million. It represents a significant overhaul of the £90 billion public procurement system. The Cabinet Office has proposed companies that demonstrate “fair working conditions” and offer staff “more than the statutory minimum” should be awarded more points. It said that this could include “access to trade union representation” and “flexible working arrangements”, along with promoting “a positive workplace culture”. It also said that employers should offer “fair pay”, with more points awarded for companies that “go further” than the minimum wage of £12.71 an hour, offer “progressive” pay policies and “reward and retain staff”.

                  [?]Kat O’Brien » 🌐
                  @obrien_kat@mastodon.world

                  Found this piece smart & well-done. Much of what we criticize as degeneracy-making a living as an influencer/on OnlyFans/in crypto, or giving up all ambition & scraping by-is conspicuous despair. We’ve gone from hedge phase to speculative to Ponzi.

                  But what will come next? Will anger & frustration at a rentier system too tilted towards those at the top just be scapegoating of the other/immigrants (as we see), or will we push for structural change?

                  henryfudgeofficial.substack.co

                  In the hedge stage of being alive (call it 1955 to roughly 1975 in the Anglosphere), a median wage covers the median life. You leave school, you get a job, you find a partner, you buy a house at three or four times your annual income, you have children, you save into a pension that your employer co-funds, and at the end you retire on something approaching your final salary. Cash flows cover principal. The future is, in the literal financial sense, affordable. The system is hedge-financed at the household level. In the speculative stage (call it 1980 to roughly 2008), wages cover the running costs of a life but not the accumulation of the assets a life requires. You can pay your rent but you cannot accumulate a deposit at the rate house prices are rising. You can service your student loans but you cannot retire them. You take on more debt to bridge the gap. You roll your overdraft. You buy your house with a 95% mortgage at six times income because there is no other way to buy it. The system is functional so long as credit remains available and asset prices keep rising. You are speculatively financed. You are, in Minsky's terms, depending on the music continuing. In the Ponzi stage (call it now), wages do not cover even the running costs of the life that previous generations defined as normal. The deposit is unreachable; the family is unaffordable; the retirement is fictional; the career path that was supposed to deliver these things has been replaced by a sequence of contracts. The only way to access the reference standard of living is to acquire assets that rise faster than wages, which means either inheriting them, marrying them, or speculating into them. Productive labour, in the Ponzi stage, is a losing strategy by construction. You cannot save your way to the life your parents had, because the life your parents had is now priced in a currency (asset wealth) that wages do not convert into.

                  Alt...In the hedge stage of being alive (call it 1955 to roughly 1975 in the Anglosphere), a median wage covers the median life. You leave school, you get a job, you find a partner, you buy a house at three or four times your annual income, you have children, you save into a pension that your employer co-funds, and at the end you retire on something approaching your final salary. Cash flows cover principal. The future is, in the literal financial sense, affordable. The system is hedge-financed at the household level. In the speculative stage (call it 1980 to roughly 2008), wages cover the running costs of a life but not the accumulation of the assets a life requires. You can pay your rent but you cannot accumulate a deposit at the rate house prices are rising. You can service your student loans but you cannot retire them. You take on more debt to bridge the gap. You roll your overdraft. You buy your house with a 95% mortgage at six times income because there is no other way to buy it. The system is functional so long as credit remains available and asset prices keep rising. You are speculatively financed. You are, in Minsky's terms, depending on the music continuing. In the Ponzi stage (call it now), wages do not cover even the running costs of the life that previous generations defined as normal. The deposit is unreachable; the family is unaffordable; the retirement is fictional; the career path that was supposed to deliver these things has been replaced by a sequence of contracts. The only way to access the reference standard of living is to acquire assets that rise faster than wages, which means either inheriting them, marrying them, or speculating into them. Productive labour, in the Ponzi stage, is a losing strategy by construction. You cannot save your way to the life your parents had, because the life your parents had is now priced in a currency (asset wealth) that wages do not convert into.

                  politically, in a withdrawal of legitimacy. This is what every late rentier society eventually produces, and it is the part of the cycle we are, I think, now entering. The behaviours of Conspicuous Despair are not, in themselves, politically dangerous. A generation that gambles, fornicates, takes drugs, refuses to marry, and lies in bed is not, by virtue of these activities, going to overthrow anything. The political danger comes at the next step, when the behavioural recognition that the game is rigged becomes a political recognition that the game is rigged, and the political recognition organises itself into a demand that the game be changed. This is what the Gracchi were, in Rome. It is what the radical Reformation was, in Northern Europe. It is what 1848 was, what 1917 was, what the various inter-war movements were. It is what populism, in its current Anglo-American forms, is: an inchoate, ill-directed, frequently malignant version of the same recognition. The populist instinct that the system is rigged is, in its raw form, correct. The populist instinct's diagnosis of who has rigged it (usually some combination of migrants, minorities, and cultural elites) is wrong, in the specific and load-bearing way that all rentier-protective ideologies are wrong: it names the visible rather than the structural, the powerless rather than the powerful.

                  Alt...politically, in a withdrawal of legitimacy. This is what every late rentier society eventually produces, and it is the part of the cycle we are, I think, now entering. The behaviours of Conspicuous Despair are not, in themselves, politically dangerous. A generation that gambles, fornicates, takes drugs, refuses to marry, and lies in bed is not, by virtue of these activities, going to overthrow anything. The political danger comes at the next step, when the behavioural recognition that the game is rigged becomes a political recognition that the game is rigged, and the political recognition organises itself into a demand that the game be changed. This is what the Gracchi were, in Rome. It is what the radical Reformation was, in Northern Europe. It is what 1848 was, what 1917 was, what the various inter-war movements were. It is what populism, in its current Anglo-American forms, is: an inchoate, ill-directed, frequently malignant version of the same recognition. The populist instinct that the system is rigged is, in its raw form, correct. The populist instinct's diagnosis of who has rigged it (usually some combination of migrants, minorities, and cultural elites) is wrong, in the specific and load-bearing way that all rentier-protective ideologies are wrong: it names the visible rather than the structural, the powerless rather than the powerful.

                    Wen boosted

                    [?]Marisa » 🌐
                    @marisa@mastodon.scot

                    Looking for a job as a Software Development Engineer but don't want to work for an evil corporation?

                    Live in the Seattle area?

                    governmentjobs.com/careers/kcl

                    King County Library System is looking for one... (position is located in Issaquah at the main service center).

                      Wen boosted

                      [?]Em :official_verified: » 🌐
                      @Em0nM4stodon@infosec.exchange

                      Bad news 😔💔

                      I am sad to announce today that unfortunately I will not be working with Privacy Guides anymore after the end of this month.

                      Good news! 🚨 :awesome:

                      I will be available for a new position or contract, starting in April!

                      I am looking for a position or contract for:

                      ✊ Digital rights activist (with a specialty in privacy rights)

                      🔒 Privacy expert or consultant

                      :mastodon: Fediverse and Mastodon advocate

                      🙌 Managerial position

                      📰 Tech journalist

                      💻 Technical writer

                      💚 Or any other fitting positions

                      I am especially interested in working with nonprofit organisations, cooperatives, open-source projects, privacy-oriented software companies, or any other organisations working for the public good.

                      🇨🇦 Remote from Canada

                      :no_AI_logo: All the work I produce is guaranteed to be AI-free

                      Let me know if you hear of any good opportunities!

                        [?]Kat O’Brien » 🌐
                        @obrien_kat@mastodon.world

                        In the Philly Inquirer, which I continue to say is among the best newspapers in the U.S., Dr. Atheendar S. Venkataramani writes: “We are overlooking the most critical element of public health for Americans: feeling stuck. …It’s more than just poverty, loneliness, or a lack of opportunity — and it is one of the biggest threats to our public health”

                        share.inquirer.com/ldmDUz

                          2 ★ 5 ↺

                          [?]Sam » 🌐
                          @sam@cablespaghetti.dev

                          It’s a long shot but if I have any followers in Chennai, India with a few years of experience who are looking for a DevOps role using AWS, Terraform and Kubernetes please get in touch!