cablespaghetti.dev is a Fediverse instance that uses the ActivityPub protocol. In other words, users at this host can communicate with people that use software like Mastodon, Pleroma, Friendica, etc. all around the world.

This server runs the snac software and there is no automatic sign-up process.

Site description
Cablespaghetti's personal snac instance
Admin email
sam@cablespaghetti.dev
Admin account
@sam@cablespaghetti.dev

Search results for tag #ipv6

[?]Thomas Schäfer » 🌐
@tschaefer@ipv6.social

>>You can simply become the owner of an Internet address block.

Problem solved.

It's the networking equivalent of complaining about your hotel bill and being told:

"Have you considered buying the hotel?"<<

linkedin.com/pulse/ipv6-going-

about , funny, but don't expect new things

    [?]Nivex 🐧 📻 [he/him] » 🌐
    @nivex@tenforward.social

    @cwebber FYI your web server doesn't appear to be listening on :
    $ curl -Iv --connect-timeout 10 dustycloud.org/
    * Host dustycloud.org:443 was resolved.
    * IPv6: 2600:3c03::f03c:92ff:fe97:da3c
    * IPv4: 45.79.144.54
    * Trying [2600:3c03::f03c:92ff:fe97:da3c]:443...
    * Trying 45.79.144.54:443...
    * Immediate connect fail for 45.79.144.54: Network is unreachable
    * Connection timed out after 10002 milliseconds
    * closing connection #0
    curl: (28) Connection timed out after 10002 milliseconds

      [?]Paco Hope [He/Him] » 🌐
      @paco@infosec.exchange

      Of course 's support starts with a stupid AI chatbot. Pretty clear how bad their ipv6 documentation is when a chatbot trained on it comes up empty.

      Screenshot of an "AI mode" search at Verizon's help page. I searched just "ipv6". One of the suggested follow up questions, that is: a question the AI suggested that I ask, is "how do I enable ipv6?" And the AI responded "Sorry I don't have an answer for that."

      Alt...Screenshot of an "AI mode" search at Verizon's help page. I searched just "ipv6". One of the suggested follow up questions, that is: a question the AI suggested that I ask, is "how do I enable ipv6?" And the AI responded "Sorry I don't have an answer for that."

        [?]Paco Hope [He/Him] » 🌐
        @paco@infosec.exchange

        I really need to learn better. At the house, I have a Verizon business line (not their residential service). I've got dedicated ipv4 addresses. I also have an ipv6 range that gets mapped by them.

        The same line runs my ISP stuff and I'm trying to do a bit of segmentation. At first I thought I'd get a hurricane electric range, because it would be stable. I could count on it. Silly me, I went and got 3 HE ranges assigned to 3 different segments. That's dumb and the router doesn't like it.

        I'm winding down the HE tunnels. That doesn't seem to be very effective. But I'm not sure (a) how to configure my to pick up whatever v6 range my ISP is sending, and (b) partition it into a couple predictable ranges. I think they delegate a /64. and then (c) assign those ranges to certain sets of systems. (They're already segregated on IPv4 /24s)

        I also don't know how stable the Verizon assignment is. I'm nervous about possibly publishing AAAA records for stuff only to find that VZ delegates a new prefix one day and all that stops working.

        I really want to learn, but there's so much randomness introduced by ISPs who don't document how stuff works.

          [?]Thomas Schäfer » 🌐
          @tschaefer@ipv6.social

          [?]Nivex 🐧 📻 [he/him] » 🌐
          @nivex@tenforward.social

          Stumbled across centerclick.com/ntp/

          I love the attitude:
          > Cloud-Free Technology
          > No stupid App, No online accounts, No subscription service, No Internet needed

          Also looks to have full . I'd be hard pressed to homebrew something like that for much cheaper. 🤔

            [?]Litchralee_v6 » 🌐
            @litchralee_v6@ipv6.social

            Does anyone know if there's still someplace to obtain a small sliver of GUA address space? I remember this one from a while back by @cr : chaos.social/@cr/1118050934626

            I figure it'd be interesting to use GUAs for routing on , neatly avoiding any issue with prefix collisions.

              [?]Nivex 🐧 📻 [he/him] » 🌐
              @nivex@tenforward.social

              folks: What's the current state of DMR linking software? HBLink was it for awhile but all the repos are archived. I'm mostly looking for something that has support or that's being maintained enough that it could be added.

                [?]Nivex 🐧 📻 [he/him] » 🌐
                @nivex@tenforward.social

                RE: the.goofs.space/@Gynux/1171176

                New -only goofiness just dropped

                [?]Gynux » 🌐
                @Gynux@the.goofs.space

                Just in case some are in the mood to do something unproductive, I have added a few things in the wabbit maker :)
                (ipv6 needed)
                rabbits.gynux.com/

                  Karl Baron boosted

                  [?]Mike Roach » 🌐
                  @mroach@ublog.mroach.com

                  I may or may not have just bought a pocket PC so I could add another user agent to my collection.

                  And fun surprise: it supports IPv6 out of the box! Windows Mobile 2003 SE had its act together.

                  #iPaq #WindowsMobile #IPv6

                    [?]Nivex 🐧 📻 [he/him] » 🌐
                    @nivex@tenforward.social

                    @kasperd You and I are in total agreement. But this is the only ISP that serves my friend's house and they've said "late 2027 or 2028" for availability. It's absolutely absurd that this is the situation, but it seems we've done everything we can for now.

                      [?]Nivex 🐧 📻 [he/him] » 🌐
                      @nivex@tenforward.social

                      Said ISP upon being asked when to expect customer availability: "As our current needs are met by IPv4, this is not a priority at the moment."

                      Wow, I haven't heard that line in 12 years: blog.flyingpenguintech.org/201

                        [?]goetz [he/him] » 🌐
                        @goetz@ipv6.social

                        dann eben Kündigung.

                        Mobilfunk Anbieter in Deutschland

                        Art der Kündigung
Ordentliche Kündigung
Kündigungsgrund
Sonstiges: Kein IPv6

                        Alt...Art der Kündigung Ordentliche Kündigung Kündigungsgrund Sonstiges: Kein IPv6

                          [?]Nivex 🐧 📻 [he/him] » 🌐
                          @nivex@tenforward.social

                          From an ISP this very morning: "We do not have customer available at this time."

                          It's the "at this time" that really bugs me. It's one of those phrases that people say because it sounds "proper" without thinking about it.

                          The "IPv6: No Longer Optional" talk was in 2010. RFC 6540 and World IPv6 Launch was in 2012. At _this_ time? What have you been doing with all the intervening time?

                            [?]Thomas Schäfer » 🌐
                            @tschaefer@ipv6.social

                            [?]gyptazy » 🌐
                            @gyptazy@gyptazy.com

                            Running a small or single user instance in the ? Get connected to other instances by a relay!

                            I just adjusted my relay instance which now also finally supports ! Of course, it also supports Pleroma, snac, Mastodon, littlefedi, starling and many other ones!

                            With relays, your own posted content gets distributed to all connected instances, as well you get the content all other instances. Currently, mostly tech related instances are connected, focusing on , , / , and many other things!

                            More information at: https://fedi-relay.gyptazy.com


                              [?]Thomas Schäfer » 🌐
                              @tschaefer@ipv6.social

                              It seems to me, that Microsoft has better implemented than NetworkManager.

                              In my test NM reduced the outgoing MTU to 1280 while windows uses the full available MTU.

                                Karl Baron boosted

                                [?]Nivex 🐧 📻 [he/him] » 🌐
                                @nivex@tenforward.social

                                Friendly reminder: When configuring nginx server blocks, you have to explicitly listen on both address families:

                                listen *:80;
                                listen [::]:80;

                                Many examples I've seen only include the first line. If you don't include the second line, I will get a Connection Refused trying to reach your site. Happy Eyeballs will paper over this if you're dual stack, but on a single stack network I'm stuck not being able to see your content.

                                (so as to avoid That Guy™ getting in my replies: listen [::]:443; for HTTPS)

                                  [?]Erik Nygren :verified: » 🌐
                                  @nygren@hachyderm.io

                                  For those relying on in production and using long uptime systemd-networkd, there is an integer overflow bug in some versions where the RA assignment will flap every five minutes following 497 days of uptime.

                                  This is fixed in v250 but does NOT appear to have been backported to Ubuntu 22.04 which is exposed to this. Fix is in:

                                  commit 16bc8635d551f73cdd9cf5c9d452f3ad9c34e9e4 from Oct 21 2021 ("network: address: use usec_t for handling lifetime")

                                    [?]Tobias Fiebig » 🌐
                                    @tfiebig@wybt.net

                                    Just learned that RFC10001 (updating BCP91 from RFC3901) finally got published!

                                    Time for more in the ! 🥳

                                    datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc10

                                      [?]Anderson Silva » 🌐
                                      @UnderEu@mas.to

                                      @quux Resources is 3 years old, today :)

                                      gitlab.com/jenslink/ipv6-resou

                                      Window screenshot from IPv6 Resources GitLab page, where it highlights the creation date: August 11, 2023

                                      Alt...Window screenshot from IPv6 Resources GitLab page, where it highlights the creation date: August 11, 2023

                                        [?]hnapel » 🌐
                                        @hnapel@mastodon.social

                                        @campuscodi

                                        NAT should have been dead with globally routable addresses but here we are.

                                          [?]Klaus Frank » 🌐
                                          @agowa338@chaos.social

                                          Note to self: Just don't touch . It's shit all way round and always breaks. Just use something else.

                                          Why?

                                          Every time I want an encrypted tunnel between two public IPs I think like "oh yea, using IPSec here would be easy and straight forward".

                                          And then it never fucking works reliably. And if it does work it stops to work the next time you try to apply the exact same config. And it fails with shit like this...

                                          What have I done wrong?!? Why work sometimes??

                                            [?]Nivex 🐧 📻 [he/him] » 🌐
                                            @nivex@tenforward.social

                                            Some day I'm going to give an Intro to Networking talk using just and when somebody inevitably presses me to talk about IPv4 I'll be like "Well, yeah, that's how we did it when I was a kid."

                                              [?]goetz [he/him] » 🌐
                                              @goetz@ipv6.social

                                              Karl Baron boosted

                                              [?]Nivex 🐧 📻 [he/him] » 🌐
                                              @nivex@tenforward.social

                                              Silly mozilla:

                                              [ERROR crashreporter::glean::uploader] failed to send glean ping: process failed (exit status exit status: 7) with stderr: curl: (7) Failed to connect to incoming.telemetry.mozilla.org port 443 after 2 ms: Could not connect to server

                                              I guess the ultimate way to avoid being tracked is to go -only.

                                                [?]Nivex 🐧 📻 [he/him] » 🌐
                                                @nivex@tenforward.social

                                                @cr @kasperd Impressive. We have set up and torn down entire transition technologies faster than some places can deploy native

                                                  [?]Nivex 🐧 📻 [he/him] » 🌐
                                                  @nivex@tenforward.social

                                                  OK, for better or worse, AMPRNet is still really hanging on to those 44Net IPv4 addresses. Now I know that 6to4 as a wider concept has been largely set aside primarily because of the anycast gateway issues, but I'm wondering if it could still be used to help this specific audience get familiar with the underlying concepts before graduating to real IPv6 addresses.

                                                  So, 2002::/16 isn't announced anymore because of aforementioned anycast issues, but could a subset of it still be announced? Consider, 44Net consists of
                                                  44.0.0.0/9
                                                  44.128.0.0/10

                                                  This translates into 6to4 prefixes of
                                                  2002:2c00::/25
                                                  2002:2c80::/26

                                                  Since ARDC already announces those v4 prefixes largely for the purpose of encapsulating them (44Connect, IPIP, etc), could they announce those v6 prefixes in the same vein? It seems quite feasible, so what weird edge cases am I missing?

                                                    Karl Baron boosted

                                                    [?]Larvitz :fedora: » 🌐
                                                    @Larvitz@burningboard.net

                                                    Nice!

                                                    Our Mastodon instance burningboard.net has almost 60% of total traffic using the current generation of the Internet Protocol (IPv6) and only arround 40% still using the legacy-protocol from the 1980s (IPv4).

                                                    Measured on the PF firewall of our Mastodon webserver over the last 48 hours.

                                                    Terminal screenshot running a shell command pipeline (pfctl -si | awk) that calculates IPv4 vs IPv6 network traffic on a server. The terminal output displays IPv4 traffic at 160.68 GiB (41.1%) and IPv6 traffic at 230.46 GiB (58.9%).

                                                    Alt...Terminal screenshot running a shell command pipeline (pfctl -si | awk) that calculates IPv4 vs IPv6 network traffic on a server. The terminal output displays IPv4 traffic at 160.68 GiB (41.1%) and IPv6 traffic at 230.46 GiB (58.9%).

                                                      [?]hnapel » 🌐
                                                      @hnapel@mastodon.social

                                                      @transfers

                                                      Crazy that IPV4 blocks are still so valuable while they should already have been relegated to the trash.

                                                      🗑️

                                                      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IPv6_dep

                                                        [?]Nivex 🐧 📻 [he/him] » 🌐
                                                        @nivex@tenforward.social

                                                        Goodness! Someone's been busy.

                                                        game.flyingpenguintech.org/

                                                        The front page of SixSpotting with current statistics:

In the last 24 hours, 120 checkins from 118 ASes by 3 players
In the last 30 days, 128 checkins from 126 ASes by 7 players

                                                        Alt...The front page of SixSpotting with current statistics: In the last 24 hours, 120 checkins from 118 ASes by 3 players In the last 30 days, 128 checkins from 126 ASes by 7 players

                                                          [?]isp6 » 🌐
                                                          @isp6@social.isp6.net

                                                          Reverse DNS (PTR) is where a lot of people give up on IPv6.

                                                          The addresses are long. The nibble format is fiddly. Mail servers still check it.

                                                          The fix isn't cleverness. It's delegation done once, correctly. Point the zone at your own nameservers, then generate the reversed-nibble records instead of counting them by hand.

                                                          Good reverse DNS is invisible. That's the whole point.

                                                          A /44 is sixteen /48s and one reverse zone. Eleven nibbles, not twelve.

                                                            [?]Nivex 🐧 📻 [he/him] » 🌐
                                                            @nivex@tenforward.social

                                                            5 of my 6 most recently filed issues on GitHub are "Please turn on IPv6 on your Github Pages hosted site":

                                                            github.com/cbor/cbor.github.io
                                                            github.com/SeaGL/seagl.github.
                                                            github.com/coredotradio/core.r
                                                            github.com/lynn/hello/issues/1
                                                            github.com/glowing-bear/glowin

                                                            4 of those have been crickets 🦗. 1 responded with "Patches welcome" to a repo that didn't actually have the code that supposedly needed patched.

                                                            This shouldn't be so difficult.

                                                              [?]Nivex 🐧 📻 [he/him] » 🌐
                                                              @nivex@tenforward.social

                                                              It's amusing to me that the first responses to FOSDEM announcing their WiFi will be only were that people will just tether to their cellphones to get out. Here in the US, if you're fortunate enough to get venue WiFi that doesn't cost a day's wages, it will almost assuredly not have any IPv6. This means I have to tether to my phone which does have IPv6 to reach my services.

                                                              Also, to anyone complaining about a network that can't reach the legacy Internet: What? 15 years lead time wasn't enough for you? (I refer to RFC 6540 and World IPv6 Launch Day in Q2 2012.)

                                                                [?]Thomas Schäfer » 🌐
                                                                @tschaefer@ipv6.social

                                                                [?]Mike Roach » 🌐
                                                                @mroach@ublog.mroach.com

                                                                I spent more time than I care to admit doing dual-stack IP detection in a way that works on modern browsers and all the way back to Internet Explorer 6.

                                                                I learned that IE6 will refuse to do XHR unless the host+port are identical to the current URL, and it doesn't support CORS. So, the workaround was using JSONP.

                                                                I wonder how many other people in the world have IE6 running with IPv6 support...

                                                                #ipv6 #internetexplorer #windowsxp

                                                                Screenshot of Internet Explorer 6 showing both IPv6 and IPv4 connectivity status

                                                                Alt...Screenshot of Internet Explorer 6 showing both IPv6 and IPv4 connectivity status

                                                                  Back to top - More...